The moral line is critical
The human domain unfolds
above the moral line. The human is thereby defined as intrinsically moral.
As our self-discovery as human beings takes us further and further above
the dividing line, into the spiritual domain, the domain of science,
discovery, art, music, literature, creativity, technology, productivity,
and boundless development, we enter the domain of the sublimely human, or
divinely human, where we begin to touch the hem of infinity and its
harmonizing Spirit that is foundational to the Universe itself, and
thereby to mankind and civilization.
Anything below the center
line, below the moral, is by definition subhuman and immoral,
trailing downwards into the sewer of humanist emptiness, the home of
empire whose hallmark is fascism, genocide, economic collapse, and
insanity expressed in the mad quest for the mass-depopulation of our
planet that has become the typical song of empire.
The impetus that that keeps
society well above the dividing line, and high up in the sublimely human
domain, where civilization is secure, is defined by our scientific
attainments in loving, living, sexing, and womanizing. In this case, sex
refers to our sublimely human or spiritual quality, which distinguishes
mankind from any other form of life on the planet and is giving us a
kind of third sex as it were, by which we become as scientists, artists,
creators, discoverers, technologists, and powerful producers, the kind of
stuff that sets us apart from all other species. In this
context the term womanizing refers not to sexual division, but to the
power that takes us beyond the leading edge in the sense in which 'woman'
had been once defined in the late 1800s as the 'highest term for man,' a
term that puts us face to face with the boundless and the absolute.
It may be noted here that
the term "man" in the generic sense was once the term for
"mind." This equality defines the top row. And its opposite, all
that is mindless, insane, and empty within, defines that which man is not.
The difference between the two is illustrated by the vast difference that
should be glaringly obvious, as the difference between freedom and death,
expressed for example as:
mankind
utilizing absolute power - real solar power -
versus
mankind's
quiet death in green genocide.
The moral line, the center dividing
line between the two extremes, defines the pivotal aspects. It defines especially
those below the moral line (highlighted in yellow) that should ring a
warning bell for us whenever we encounter them, waning us of the sewer below.
With this in mind, let's
look at each of the four columns by itself, each with its pivot at the
center.
1 - Let's look at the first
column, with the pivot leaning towards, "domestic violence."
our
loving
domestic violence
fascism
Domestic violence is what we drop into if we fall
below the moral line. If we drop deep enough, fascism becomes the
inevitable end-product. But none of that is human. It's subhuman. There is
no trace of humanity involved below the moral line, such as in violence.
Violence is not human. The human dimension
begins above the
moral line. The human dimension is thereby intrinsically moral. The difference between domestic violence and domestic harmony
is therefore a moral question, and this question is centered on what is
inherently human.
In exploring this
dimension, the power for the upwards movement above the moral
line is our loving. Love becomes the guarantor that keeps the door closed
to domestic violence, and of course also to its grossest universal form, which is
fascism.
The moral line is easily
crossed however, into the sub-moral domain. In fact the dividing line is often hard to detect. The
social-networking cyber-games, for example, are designed to be highly damaging
instruments, inflicting a form of 'domestic violence.' They creates a value system centered on
personal friendships (paraded in public), which is a 'violent' degradation
of a person's native sense of self-worth, a person's self-acknowledged
worth as a human individual. The cyber-networking projects are definitely
not love-promoting and friendship promoting, but promote competition,
insecurity, strive, and is some cases mental effects that have in far too
many cases lead to physical
violence.
There are many more similar aspects
grouped along this line, which all qualify
for the term, domestic violence, as they inflict injury in one's home sphere, subtly, and
often deeply
cutting. The American President's 2010 IMAB "death-panel" healthcare
reform, with its perpetuity clause, and with the proposed federal law that
demands all American citizens to purchase private health insurance, under
penalty of law, is domestic violence in the extreme. Indeed, it borders on
fascism, if it doesn't already fully qualifies for the term.
2 - Let's look at the second
column, "political violence."
our
living
political violence
genocide
Political violence is what we drop
into as we venture below the moral line in our living, crossing into the sub-human
domain on the political scene, and beyond that into the sewer, termed empire, that is defined as
depravity. Politics, when it becomes totally devoid of any trace of
humanity invariable becomes genocide. Genocide has long been the trademark
of the politics of empire, as has been openly demonstrated at the Climate
Change Conference of 2009 in Copenhagen where the centerpiece of policy
had demanded a worldwide population reduction (genocide) to below the two
billion mark under the cover of fighting manmade global warming.
The Copenhagen conference, and the imperial demand for which it was
staged, present a perfect case of political violence carried to the
extreme. It begins with election fraud, and so forth, but rarely ever stops
there, but is trailing out into war, terror, and genocide.
The human domain above the
moral line may be termed "moral living," where we find such
developments unfolding as the Principle of the Advantage of the Other that
ended a century of war in 1648 with the Peace of Westphalia. At the high
extreme in this column science opens us the cultural processes for a new
renaissance, such as the Golden Renaissance, which rests on the shoulders
of giants, like Plato and Nicolas of Cusa.
3 - Let's look at the third
column.
our
sexing
apocalyptic mysticism - (2012)
economic collapse
Apocalyptic mysticism is what we get
into when, as a society we drop below the moral line in terms of
recognizing our identity as human beings, We face apocalyptic mysticism below the moral
line, because it defines the sub-human domain when we let go of what intrinsically
defines our humanity. There is nothing
human about apocalyptic mysticism. It is immoral, because the terror of hopelessness
(like the 2012 myth) robs society of it native sense of human power. Every
form of apocalyptic dreaming is a crime against humanity, because the mysticism
that it engenders, cannot stand in the light of scientific fact, and
becomes a denial of it. If this particular sub-human trend is carried to
the extreme, the mysticism destroys the foundation for society's economic
existence. An extreme example of this type is the mysticism of imperial
monetarism (wealth created by looting - money making money), which causes
the total collapse of physical production, and thereby the collapse of
civilization. LaRouche's triple curve illustrates the nature of mysticism,
or any process without a human element in it. And the imperial sewer of
monetarism is apocalyptic in nature by design. In this case the apocalypse
has fancy technical names that inspire fear, like market crash, for which
the greatest sacrifices are demanded to prevent it, like the endless
bail-out schemes.
In human domain above the
moral line, we face plain common sense. That's the hallmark of a 'healthy'
human being. In respect to the 2012-myth of the end of the world, common
sense tells us that we have nothing to fear when the calendar sequences
from December 31, to January 1st of the next year. The world doesn't end.
Nor will it end on December 21, 2012, when the Mayan calendar rolls over
to the next great cycles in terms of how the Mayans measured time with
their long calendar. But the human being doesn't stop with common sense.
Mankind is much more than a male and female animal who are limited by sex
to the small sphere of their pair bonding. The human being is a scientific
being, even a spiritual being who can see with mind's eye the operation of
universal principles that are invisible to the physical eye. This vast
capability of the human being for discovering, understanding, creating,
and producing, gives the human being a unique character, a kind of third
sex that sets mankind apart from any other living species. In this we find
the human power for creative and productive economic processes. We have
become the creator and builder of our own world, and there is no trace of
mysticism involved. It is a case of clearly demonstrated creative power
that enables 6.7 billion people to live on this planet on resources that
have been created by productive human processes, and the science and
technologies that enable them. Science is one of the 'dimensions' of man
in the generic sense, a kind of third sex reflecting the quality of
mind. It is reported that in one of the
ancient languages the corresponding word for man
is also used as a synonym for mind.
4
- The center piece in the final column, below the moral line, the
sub-human begins with science
fraud.
our
womanizing
science fraud - (planet x)
ice age genocide
Science fraud is a perversion of science, and since science is a
key human element, science fraud is a fraud on our humanity. This makes
any such subversion definitely sub-human. Unfortunately, we have seen a lot
that in modern times, as for example reflected in the global warming hoax,
bio-fuels, green genocide, false science, and pseudo-science. The planet-x
'theory' is just an example. It is as distance from science as are the
black-holes and big-bang theories, or the gravity-only Universe. Mistaken
science is also dangerous, such as the Ice Age theory of Serbia's
Milutin Milankovitch,
the widely honored pioneer of the (Milankovitch) orbital cycles that are
deemed to be responsible for the Ice Ages. The problem here is that the
observed evidence doesn't match the computed expectations, as one would
expect since the theory is based on a gravity-only universe that leaves
99% of the universe out of the equation, and and a lot of other things.
The danger with such pseudo-science is that its false conclusions tend to
give the impression that the resumption of the next glaciation cycle is
still a thousand years away and thereby prevents the preparation of our
planet for the cold climate that may strike in far less time. The timely
evidence suggests that we may be far closer that we are willing to admit,
considering that it will take a century of intense, scientific,
technological, and economic progress to build the infrastructures required
to shift the global agriculture into indoor facilities. If bad science
delays this, a vast genocide will likely result when the Ice Age resumes
and the world is not ready for it. No one can live without food, and when
the temperatures collapse around the world, very little of it can be
grown. Genocide will then becomes the unavoidable outcome. The same can
also be said about bad political science, such as equations that include
empire, depopulation, and austerity; and bad economic science, such as the
day-dreams that justify
monetarism and looting.
Science is therefore one of
the key elements of civilization that must be extremely well guarded,
developed, and be advanced beyond just playing games with it. Even the
leading edge should not be deemed a limit. The challenge to step beyond
the leading edge, to build the greatest renaissance ever, and ever greater
ones, must never be let go. If man and mind are once again to become
synonymous, the term science must also have a new name, related to man. A
hundred years ago such a synonym was proposed, when it was said that
"woman is the highest term for man." The concept seems to
reflect what John the Revelator had recognized 1,800 years early when he
saw the new humanity in his mind in the form of "a woman clothed with
the sun, and moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve
stars," (Rev. 12:1) the stars of a scientific rejoicing,
acknowledging that the night and its travails are no more..
Two
wings of the same bird
While the two wings
of a bird are not identical, they are functionally comparable, which applies
also to the wings of civilization.
domestic violence
and
apocalyptic mysticism
When seen in the
larger sense, apocalyptic mysticism and domestic violence in the global context
begin to merge. With the use of modern technology it becomes possible to
intentionally unleash violent events that are normally natural events of an apocalyptic
nature, but when inflicted on purpose, becomes domestic violence in the global domicile
of mankind. A lot of mysticism has captured many minds in modern times, such as
technologies to create earthquakes
on demand or violent
weather modification to punish the 'naughty;' or to cause deadly
pollution to alter the
balance of power; or to inflict biological
violence on
populations; or even to inflict global terrorism with thinly
veiled covert operations.
There is a great psychological
danger involved in all of these cases. It is the mysticism that is involved that
causes the danger, as no
physical evidence exists or is possible to prove intentional violence, as in
that case, for example, of the conspiracy mysteries of HAARP-inflicted
earthquakes, since earthquakes do happen naturally, though they
are rarely timed to precisely coincide
with major political events. The mysticism in such cases has a disabling effect on society.
For example the mysticism surrounding the 911 terror event, which has sparked
widespread 911-truth efforts, has created a situation in society in which the
911-truth efforts have actually been more damaging to it. The 911-truth efforts
have unveiled evidence of potential government involvement in the terror act.
The result is that society becomes more terrified by having to ask itself
that if governments can arrange these violent attacks on society with apparent
ease, and perpetrate them with impunity, what else will they yet do? Thus, the
truth-efforts tend to become a form of violence itself if they fall short of corrective
actions as they evidently do in all of the cases of similar nature.
political violence
and science fraud
Much the same happens
when science fraud becomes political violence, such as in the case of the manmade
global warming doctrine,
the bio-fuels
swindle, the green
carbon genocide, and science
for blinding society - the
end result is genocide by preventable natural catastrophes, but which are
intentionally not prevented in order to allow the 'natural' genocide to unfold (as
in the case of the ice age genocide) as required for political objectives.
Political violence
can have many faces. Some are obvious, like the torturing of prisoners, the
modern Inquisition. Others are slightly less obvious, such as the withdrawal of
healthcare under political directives, or the imposition of murderous austerity,
called "the hard choices" because it kills people physically. All of
those have been widely discussed and are increasingly tolerated. But there is
one form of 'violence' that remains quietly hidden, though it may have more more
wide-reaching consequences than society likes to acknowledge. I am talking about
the
circumcision, which goes far back into history and now claims over
3/4 of billion victims with lifelong consequences and effects that shape the
course of many nations, if not the world as a whole. And the root here too, is
political, and to some degree the politics of religion. Science is also drawn
into the service to excuse it -- sexual amputation by science in the service of
health. But science is often itself 'amputated' for the purpose of rendering it
disabled. H.G. Wells is a champion for keeping society scientifically blinded so
that it wouldn't upset the fraudulently claimed power of empire. That's what he advertised
with his novel "The Time Machine." The cultural scene has been flooded
with anti-science literature and movements, from global warming to anti-nuclear,
including the depopulation green genocide movements, anti-industrial movements,
and anti-technology and primitive farming movement. Here political violence and
science fraud overlaps. There is also pure science fraud happening, where
science potentially becomes a fraud against itself, such a black-hole and
big-bang science, that becomes a black hole in itself and keeps science tied
into knots, focusing on theories that have no more a rational basis than the medieval
flat-earth theories had. That's the kind of stuff that H.G. Wells would have
loved. Such black-hole science projects have become a powerful drain of science
funding and and the leading edge talents, bleeding productive projects dry, like
nuclear fusion power research, fast flux fission research, and advanced nuclear
power and nuclear medicine application development. In a high-level sense,
intentional science fraud is political violence. In almost all such cases a type
of 'amputation' or circumcision is imposed the serves political objectives,
objectives of empire.
|
