|
"There is an old saying," I said to her, "if one can't stand the heat, one should stay out of the kitchen."
"Except if one does this, one starves to death," she said, and laughed. "This means, I must fight on," she added. "I must fight on, for the simple reason that none of those problems have any relevance to the universality of Love. The problems don't alter what Love is. After all, what do the problems have to do with anything? Do they change the principle involved, the Principle of Universal Love?"
"That's a courageous stand to take," I said.
"No Peter, that's an easy stand to take when you know you're right. When your stand is rooted in the Principle of Universal Love, then you suddenly know that you are right, Peter, and you are empowered by this knowing to move forward."
"But how do you know, Helen,..."
She interrupted me before I finished the sentence. "Why do people treat each other as property?" she said in a serious tone of voice. "Why do they privatize each other's reflection of Love? Only their poverty would cause this. So, how should one respond to that? Shouldn't one respond with following Love as a model? The very notion of privatization and property runs contrary the Principle of the General Welfare that is an expression of Love. Privatization means taking society's wealth and locking it up in the private domain, where it becomes useless and is lost to society. A person shouldn't be treated that way."
Helen gradually began to laugh at her own silly questions. "The Pharaohs couldn't have privatized their slaves sex, as this is done in modern times under doctrines of religion that have become traditions. The Pharaohs had no such option open to them. So they resorted to cutting the people's sex off in order to make them real slaves that wouldn't threaten the empire. In the modern world privatization accomplishes the same thing without any force being used at all, and it makes people belief they are happy. However, this grassroots privatization appears to be only symbolic for the ultimate privatization of everything else that society depends on. The game is still on, Peter, to promote what inhibits the Principle of the General Welfare."
"The masters of empire have privatized our money," I interjected, "and our American central bank, also some of our railroads; now they want to privatize our bridges, highways, canals, and so on. There is even talk being heard about privatizing our nation's water. Next they'll privatize the air - they would do this if they could apply it for looting society. In the system of empire, everything is privatized. The privatized institutions operate like a wrecking ball in society, wrecking society from within, without anyone having any way of stopping the wrecking ball. Whatever is privatized in the world of empire, is taken outside the Principle of the General Welfare. On this course entire industries can be trashed for making profit, and their workers be thrown onto the street, because what is private is deemed to be an empire unto itself, and out of reach for being accountable to society. Even our great Democratic Party in America, is deemed to be a private club that is not accountable for how its votes are counted, provided that the votes are counted at all. The party has become a privately owned empire, owned by foreign interests. And as you might have guessed, the entire conglomeration of empire is scared of the Principle of the General Welfare that would necessarily scrap all this privatized insanity. That is why the masters of empire are fighting this principle at every turn and chance that comes along. Like the Pharaohs were scared of it, so the modern masters are scared of it and are determined to wreck it globally at all cost, even to the point of imposing genocide and the most massive population 'reduction' like you can't imagine, which has been on the drawing board for some time. The stated policy of intention is to eliminate four to five billion people from the face of the planet."
Next Page
|| - page index -
|| - chapter index -
|| - Exit -
||
|
